Haynes v. State of Oregon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
Petitioner filed an amended petition for post-conviction relief in which he claims that his conviction is void, because his trial counsel’s representation was constitutionally inadequate and therefore violated his right to counsel under the state and federal constitutions. ORS 138.530(l)(a). The court denied relief. We reverse and remand.
Petitioner’s stepson had been released on parole from MacLaren School for Boys and was living in the community. See ORS 420.045(1). On July 27,1988, a juvenile parole officer and a Eugene police officer went to petitioner’s house to look for the stepson…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Porter v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Warren v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Burdge v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Maney v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Lovelace v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Trotter v. SantosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.