Legal Opinion

Maney v. Angelozzi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 2017No. 120303343; A156638PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, J.

Petitioner appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, contending that his trial attorney rendered inadequate assistance of counsel by failing to address purportedly improper comments and interruptions by the trial court. In the underlying criminal case, a jury convicted petitioner of various offenses arising from allegations that he had beaten his 14-year-old daughter with a wooden board and subjected her to other assaultive conduct. During petitioner’s trial, the court repeatedly interrupted the proceedings to chastise defense counsel, address witnesses, and instruct the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BrunnemerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Waldorf v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Drown v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Reed v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API