Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. National Lead Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 4, 1953No. 29500PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have sued for treble damages under 15 U.S.C.A. § 15. Pre-trial proceedings have been had and are continuing, preparatory to trial, now set for May 4, 1953.
At pre-trial conference held on December 12, 1952, there was presented, argued and thereafter submitted on briefs, a motion of defendants to strike from the complaint and for a pre-trial ruling, excluding at the trial, all reference by plaintiffs to U. S. v. National Lead Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1945, 63 F.Supp. 513, affirmed 1947, 332 U.S. 319, 67 S.Ct. 1634, 91 L.Ed. 2077.
In U. S. v. National Lead Co. et al.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. National Lead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- International Shoe MacHine Corporation v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
- Al Barnett & Son, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Hunter Douglas Corporation v. Lando Products, Inc., Lando Products, Inc. v. Hunter Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.