Legal Opinion

United States v. Vicon Const. Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 28, 1983No. 83 CIV 5330 (LBS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

The Government seeks reimbursement for payments made to various landowners under a federal flood insurance program. Defendant’s negligence allegedly caused the flooding and subsequent damage. The Government’s suit is based on its right of subrogation under the insurance program. Defendant moves for summary judgment, claiming the statute of limitations bars this lawsuit. For the following reasons, we grant defendant’s motion.

The federal tort statute of limitations provides in pertinent part: “[Ejvery action for money damages brought by the United States or an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Lee A. Limbs, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. BlackmonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1980
  3. United States v. WhitesellDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blusal Meats, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. United States v. First National Bank of Cicero and Leslie I. CohodesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bank One, WaukeshaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GreenwoodDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API