Robbins v. Physicians for Women's Health, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The principal issue in this case is whether the trial court incorrectly concluded that a covenant not to sue, executed by the plaintiff in favor of a corporate tortfeasor, forecloses the imposition of successor liability, as a matter of law, on a subsequent purchaser of that company’s assets. For the reasons listed below, we answer this question in the affirmative and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The record contains the following undisputed facts and procedural history that are relevant to our resolution of the present case. The plaintiff, Lisa…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Craig v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Dwy v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robbins v. PHYSICIANS FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Robbins v. Physicians for Women's Health, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Robbins v. Physicians for Women's Health, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012