Legal Opinion
State v. Visser
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided January 28, 1999No. 971760-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Associate Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Defendant Brad Visser appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his 1997 guilty plea to Rape, claiming that in taking his plea, the trial court did not strictly comply with Rule 11(e) of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure. We reverse the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 On October 16, 1996, defendant was charged by information with Aggravated Sexual Assault of a sixteen-year-old girl. Aggravated Sexual Assault is a first degree felony carrying a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. GibbonsUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MaguireUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. AbeytaUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ThurstonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. VisserUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TarnawieckiCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- State v. CorwellUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. OstlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.