Legal Opinion

Viner v. Sweet

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 2001No. B138149PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

112 Cal.Rptr.2d 426 (2001)

92 Cal.App.4th 730

Michael VINER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

Charles A. SWEET et al., Defendants and Appellants.

No. B138149.

Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven.

September 28, 2001.

Review Granted December 19, 2001.

Munger, Tolles & Olson, Dennis C. Brown, Mark B. Helm, Allison B. Stein, Steven W. Hawkins, Los Angeles; Kester & Isenberg and Charles F. Kester, Woodland Hills, for Defendants and Appellants.

Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, Patricia L. Glaser and Peter C. Sheridan, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Cert…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API