Legal Opinion

ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 2003No. A101737PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAY, P. J.

The law in California is well established that when legal malpractice involves negligence in the prosecution or defense of a legal claim, the case-within-a-case methodology must be used. More specifically, for purposes of this case, which involved settlement of litigation, the plaintiff must prove his opponent in the underlying litigation would have settled for less, or that following a trial, plaintiff would have obtained a judgment more favorable than the settlement.

Real party in interest Michael A. Malcolm sued petitioners for malpractice, alleging they omitted critical…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Filbin v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Law Offices of Dixon R. Howell v. ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. Cole v. Town of Los GatosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Callahan v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API