Legal Opinion

Egelak v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1968No. 855PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

In this appeal appellant asks that the case be remanded to the superior court for re-sentencing because of irregularities which occurred in regard to sentencing procedures prior to the entry of judgment and commitment. In light of our review of the record in this case, we are of the opinion that none of the asserted irregularities in the sentencing procedures resulted in any fundamental unfairness to appellant. We, therefore, affirm the superior court’s denial of appellant’s motion for resentencing. 1

In' the lower court appellant was indicted for the crime of first degree…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. John Christopher DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. RLR v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Gafford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. HannaganAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API