Legal Opinion
FINNEGAN, LLC v. Township Council
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 3, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
926 A.2d 402 (2007)
394 N.J. Super. 303
RIYA FINNEGAN, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF SOUTH BRUNSWICK, Defendant-Appellant, and
The Planning Board of the Township of South Brunswick, Defendant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 28, 2007.
Decided July 3, 2007.
Anthony M. Campisano, North Brunswick, argued the cause for appellant (Bucca & Campisano, attorneys; Mr. Campisano, on the brief).
Henry L. Kent-Smith, Princeton, argued the cause for respondent (Saul Ewing, attorneys; Mr. Kent-Smith, of counsel and on the brief; Jennifer Forrest, on the brief).
Before…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Palisades Properties, Inc. v. BrunettiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Bow & Arrow Manor, Inc. v. Town of West OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Kirsch Holding Co. v. Borough of ManasquanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Riya Finnegan LLC v. S. Brunswick Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Riya Finnegan LLC v. S. Brunswick Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Riya Finnegan LLC v. S. Brunswick Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008