Legal Opinion

Mautino v. Piercedale Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1940No. Appeals, 85 and 86PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Patterson,

John Mautino, a minor, his mother, Catherine Ghéa and his step-father, Dalmiro Ghea, appellees, instituted an action -in trespass against the appellant, Piercedale Supply Co., whose employee, it whs alleged, sold to Gail Nix, a hoy under sixteen years of age, in violation of section 1 of the Act of Juné 10,1881, P; L. Ill, the cartridge with which he inflicted serious injury upon the minor appellee. The trial resulted in a verdict awarding the minor appellee the sum of $3,478.26 and awarding the Gheas the sum of $1,685.50, including $685.50 medical and hospital…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Nelson v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Carter v. TowneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. McMillen v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. RootSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Skoda v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. Scheels Hardware & Sports Shop, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Roadman v. BelloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API