Mautino v. Piercedale Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Patterson,
John Mautino, a minor, his mother, Catherine Ghéa and his step-father, Dalmiro Ghea, appellees, instituted an action -in trespass against the appellant, Piercedale Supply Co., whose employee, it whs alleged, sold to Gail Nix, a hoy under sixteen years of age, in violation of section 1 of the Act of Juné 10,1881, P; L. Ill, the cartridge with which he inflicted serious injury upon the minor appellee. The trial resulted in a verdict awarding the minor appellee the sum of $3,478.26 and awarding the Gheas the sum of $1,685.50, including $685.50 medical and hospital…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Nelson v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Carter v. TowneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- McMillen v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Commonwealth v. RootSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Skoda v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. Scheels Hardware & Sports Shop, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Roadman v. BelloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.