Legal Opinion
United States v. Cesar Duran
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 17, 1992No. 91-1926PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Karen Duran, wife of appellant Cesar Duran, could not figure out how to lace a pair of recently purchased leather “L.A. Gear” high-top tennis shoes, so she sought assistance at a Foot Locker store in the Janesville (Wisconsin) Mall. Karen left the shoes with a Foot Locker employee who agreed to lace them; in the interim, she shopped elsewhere in the Mall and had lunch with her two daughters, who were then two and three years old. After Karen departed, the employee discovered in the shoes three packages of what appeared to be marijuana, and called the police. Detectives…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. Joseph N. BasinskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Aaron L. SalvoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Imad Naim Saadeh, Barbara Sudzus, and Albert SudzusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Mesa RithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.