United States v. Eric J. Monaghan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
The propriety of the prosecutor’s closing remarks to the jury, an issue raised not infrequently in appeals, is the question *1436here. Appellant Monaghan contends that the prosecutor made impermissible references to his decision not to take the witness stand, and that the prosecutor attempted to inflame the passions and prejudices of the jury. We conclude that the statements in question did not infringe appellant’s fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination or due process rights; we therefore affirm the conviction.
I
Appellant Eric Monaghan was charged in a six count1 indictment with…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- State v. TylerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.