Legal Opinion

Keeton v. Tesla

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 2024No. A166690Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/26/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE DOMINIQUE KEETON, Plaintiff and Respondent, A166690 v. TESLA, INC., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG21109088) Defendant and Appellant. Plaintiff Dominique Keeton sued her employer, Tesla, Inc. (Tesla), for discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. The parties agreed to submit the dispute to arbitration as provided in their arbitration agreement. After Tesla failed to pay its arbitration fees within the 30-day window established by Code of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API