Legal Opinion

Kradolfer v. Smith

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1990No. 90-157PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

On March 28, 1990, applicant, Kimberly A. Kradolfer, filed this application for declaratory judgment on original proceedings in this Court requesting that § 37-61-211, MCA, be declared invalid as a violation of the separation of powers clause of the Montana Constitution insofar as it imposes an annual license tax of $25 upon attorneys admitted to practice in the State of Montana. She requests this Court to provide appropriate relief, including enjoining respondent Ed Smith, Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court, from collecting any legislatively imposed license tax. Finally,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sterling v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Board of Overseers of the Bar v. LeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Frieson v. IsnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Butte-Silver Bow Local Government v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Quelch v. DaughertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Smith v. MagrasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Burkhart v. Semitool, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Pate v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  5. Smith v. MagrasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API