Legal Opinion
Brunson v. Director of the Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 27, 1965No. [App. No. 136, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
In August of 1963 the applicant, represented by court-appointed counsel, was convicted of burglary of a warehouse. He received a sentence of not more than three years and was then transferred to Patuxent Institution for evaluation as a defective delinquent. In June of 1964, after a trial by jury, he was found to be a defective delinquent and committed to Patuxent. It is from this finding that application for leave to appeal is sought.
Applicant, through his court-appointed attorney, relies on errors allegedly committed by the trial court as follows: (1) the overruling of defendant’s motion for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bullock v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Faulkner v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Daniels v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Rice v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Washington v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sas v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969
- Wise v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Blakney v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- McCloskey v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Bougknight v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.