Legal Opinion
Klinge Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 27, 2009No. 08-551CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending in this bid protest are plaintiffs and defendant’s motions for reconsideration of our opinion of September 12, 2008. That opinion resolved the second bid protest in this court arising out of the Marine Corps’ (“agency”) continuing effort to procure Large Field Refrigeration Systems (“LFRS”). In the first proceeding, we granted injunctive relief to plaintiff, Klinge Corp. (“Klinge”), enjoining the Marine Corps from going forward with its putative award to intervenor, Sea Box Inc. (“Sea Box”). In this second action, plaintiff challenged the agency’s use of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Baird Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- CNA Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Beta Analytics International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Shields Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Red River Holdings, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.