Legal Opinion
Herlth v. Merck & Co Inc
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 15, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00438Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT KORRINE HERLTH, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:21-cv-438 (JAM) MERCK & CO., INC. et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff Korrine Herlth alleges that she was injured after receiving two doses of the Gardasil vaccine. Herlth now brings a variety of product liability claims against the vaccine’s manufacturers, Merck & Co., Inc., and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (collectively, “Merck”). Merck has moved to dismiss her amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, I will grant the motion to dismiss without prejudice. BACKGROUND I…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.