Legal Opinion
Norman v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 23, 1993No. 89-CO-1359PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant, James E. Norman, appeals from an order of the motions judge denying his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his enhanced sentence. Appellant’s principal contention is that his enhanced sentence was imposed in an illegal manner 1 because part of the trial judge’s inquiry pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-lll(b) (1989) 2 occurred prior to his conviction and not after his conviction, as required by that statute. Thus, he argues that this case should be remanded for resentencing. We affirm.
I
APPELLANT’S CONVICTIONS AND SENTENCING
On September 4,1987, appellant was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Shepard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Veney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Daramy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Veney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.