Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Swan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 8, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.

[¶ 1] Robert G. Conrad appeals from a judgment of the District Court (South Paris, Lawrence, J.) denying his objection to a final order of parental rights and responsibilities in which the Family Law Magistrate (Carlson, M.) rendered a default judgment against him for failure to appear. Conrad argues that the court abused its discretion by denying his objection and adopting the default judgment as the court’s final order of parental rights and responsibilities. In addition, Conrad argues that the magistrate erred by failing to consider the best interest of the child as mandated by 19-A M.R.S.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Porges v. ReidSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Pierce v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Truman v. BrowneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Fitch v. John or Jane Doe 1Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  5. Powell v. PowellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wong v. HawkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. Smith v. RideoutSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  3. TD Banknorth, N.A. v. HawkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Estate of Dennis R. Kay v. Estate of Douglas J. WigginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. Kelley v. SnowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API