United States v. Gokhale
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
That the defendant was not in fact eligible for naturalization is settled by U. S. v. Thind, 261 U. S. 204, 43 S. Ct. 338, 67 L. Ed. 616, for he is eoneededly a Hindu, and under that ease a Hindu is not a white person as the statute defines that phrase. This being so, the only question re- * maining is whether his admission by the Supreme Court of New York-was res judicata and not open to review by bill in equity under section 15 of the Naturalization Act (8 USCA § 405). We assume that the United States had in fact the opportunity given by section 11 (8 USCA § 399) to appear in opposition to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. NessSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. ThindSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. Sakharam Ganesh PanditCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. KuscheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
- United States v. BrassDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- United States v. BischofCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- United States v. CostelloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- United States v. BischofDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929