United States v. William Cornelius Campbell, Franklin Leon Blige
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Chief Judge:
Codefendants William Cornelius Campbell and Franklin Leon Blige appeal sentences imposed under the federal sentencing guidelines. Campbell raises constitutional challenges to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, the United States Sentencing Commission, and the sentencing guidelines promulgated by the Commission. Blige challenges the manner in which the district court applied the guidelines to him. We affirm.
Facts
In December 1987, Campbell and Blige, using toy guns, robbed a C & S Bank in Augusta, Georgia. They took approximately $25,000 and fled on foot. Within eight minutes,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Robert Spraggins, A/K/A Bob StaggsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. ErvesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Barry Lawrence SpellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. SpoerkeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Paul Edward HromadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Willis Ray CashCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Frank Robert BriggmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.