Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Robert Briggman

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 29, 1991No. 89-6274PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

This appeal examines the denial of a motion to suppress and an enhanced sentence. Defendant-appellant Frank Robert Briggman contends that the district court erred in allowing the presentation of evidence obtained pursuant to a stop in a high crime area and in sentencing him based upon an upward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines. Upon review of the record, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

At approximately 4:00 a.m. on February 17, 1989, Lieutenant Marvin Austin of the Metro-Dade Police Department routinely was patrolling northbound on N.W. 2nd Avenue near 166th Street in Miami, Florida. An…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. United States v. Eugene L. DawdyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. James C. HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Klare v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  5. United States v. Alonzo DayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API