Legal Opinion

United States v. Barry Lawrence Spell

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 9, 1995No. 93-4764PublishedCited by 113 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Appellant challenges his bank robbery sentence, arguing that the district court improperly treated him as a “career offender” under § 4B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines. We reverse and remand to the district court for resentencing.

I. BACKGROUND

A federal grand jury indicted Appellant Barry Spell on three counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (West Supp.1994). In March 1993, Appellant entered into a plea agreement with the Government and pled guilty to one count of bank robbery.

The Government’s Presentenee Investigation Report (PSI) calculated Appellant’s final adjusted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Richard Eugene SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Ramon Gonzalez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Lazaro RomanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. United States v. ChhienCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Defabian C. ShannonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. BecklesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Palomino GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API