Legal Opinion
Deniece Design, LLC v. Braun
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 19, 2013No. Civil Action No. H-12-2814PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.
The above referenced action seeks injunctive relief and a declaratory judgment that Plaintiff DeNiece Design LLC’s (“DeNiece’s”) products have not infringed and do not infringe United States Patent 7,255,299 (the “'299 patent”) for a fabric storage panel, purportedly owned by Defendant Elaine Braun (“Braun”), or that the patent is invalid, or that Braun is barred from enforcing the '299 Patent on the grounds of waiver, laches, and estoppel because of Braun’s action or inaction. Braun counterclaims for patent infringement, false marking under 35…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ameranth, Inc. v. ChowNow, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Banquete Independent School District v. The Alliance for Community Solutions, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2026
- Grace Instrument Industries, LLC v. Chandler Instruments Company, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025