Legal Opinion
Zavislak v. Netflix, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 16, 2021No. 5:21-cv-01811Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MARK ZAVISLAK, Case No. 5:21-cv-01811-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, 10 v. MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY 11 NETFLIX, INC., JUDGMENT, AND MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY 12 Defendant. 13 Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19, 31 14 Plaintiff Mark Zavislak filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security 15 Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) against Defendant Netflix, Inc. (“Netflix”) asserting claims seeking the 16 following: (1) monetary damages under 29 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.