Legal Opinion
Chavez v. S.E.D. Laboratories
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 2000No. 19,700PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARMIJO, Judge.
{1} Phil Chavez (Chavez) appeals the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Administration (WCA) that required him to reimburse his employer, S.E.D. Laboratories, and its workers’ compensation insurer, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (collectively, S.E.D./USF & G), certain benefits paid to him. Chavez sustained injuries as a result of an automobile accident. It is undisputed that Chavez’ injuries were work related. In addition to seeking benefits to which he was entitled under the Workers’ Compensation Act, Chavez also made a claim against the uninsured/under…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Martinez v. Southwest Landfills, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Stinbrink v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Brown v. Arapahoe Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Montoya v. Aral Security, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chavez v. S.E.D. LaboratoriesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Jones v. AugéNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- McDonald v. Zimmer Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Bordnick v. HoyleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jackson v. K & M ConstructionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.