Legal Opinion
Chavez v. S.E.D. Laboratories
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 2000No. 26,227, 26,231PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Chief Justice.
{1} S.E.D. Laboratories (SED) and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF & G) (jointly, SED/USF & G) appeal from an opinion of the Court of Appeals holding that an employer’s right of reimbursement is equal to the amount of an injured worker’s duplicative recovery from uninsured motorist benefits and workers’ compensation benefits and directing reconsideration of an order requiring Phil Chavez to pay all of his attorney’s fees. We affirm these holdings of the Court of Appeals. Chavez appeals from the Court of Appeals’ holding that he waived appellate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- H. T. Coker Construction Co. v. Whitfield Transportation, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tom Growney Equipment Co. v. JouettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Baca v. LOS LUNAS COMMUNITY PROGRAMSNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Liberty Mutual v. Kinser, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Jones v. AugéNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- McDonald v. Zimmer Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.