Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 25, 2015No. 20130405-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

TOOMEY, Judge:

T1 David James Allen appeals his sentence, arguing that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not asserting that Allen had mental-health issues as a defense for his probation violation. We affirm.

T2 On February 6, 2012, Allen pled guilty to one count of attempted distribution of a controlled substance, a third-degree felony. As part of the plea agreement, the State agreed to recommend the reduction of Allen's offense to a class A misdemeanor upon his successful completion of probation. Before sentencing, Allen moved to withdraw his guilty plea,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Layton City v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Utah Transit Authority v. Local 382 of the Amalgamated Transit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Duran v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LeggUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. LeggCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API