State v. Allen
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
TOOMEY, Judge:
T1 David James Allen appeals his sentence, arguing that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not asserting that Allen had mental-health issues as a defense for his probation violation. We affirm.
T2 On February 6, 2012, Allen pled guilty to one count of attempted distribution of a controlled substance, a third-degree felony. As part of the plea agreement, the State agreed to recommend the reduction of Allen's offense to a class A misdemeanor upon his successful completion of probation. Before sentencing, Allen moved to withdraw his guilty plea,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Layton City v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Utah Transit Authority v. Local 382 of the Amalgamated Transit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Duran v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 2009
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LeggUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. LeggCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016