Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 26, 2009No. Case No. 20070694-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

~{1 Defendant Seott Lynwood Perry appeals the district court's revocation of his probation, asserting that his due process rights were denied when an evidentiary hearing was conducted in his absence. Defendant's due process claim is not reviewable under plain error because Defendant's counsel invited the alleged error. Defendant's claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel fails because Defendant did not demonstrate that he suffered any actual prejudice due to his counsel's allegedly deficient performance. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 In 2008, Defendant was charged…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Glover v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  2. State v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  3. State v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. State v. DominguezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  5. State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API