Simpson v. Commonwealth

Opinion op the Court by

Ohiep «Justice Hurt—

Affirming.

W. W. Simpson, the appellant, was in-dieted for a violation of the prohibition statute of 1920. The indictment charged him with each of the offenses of unlawfully selling, bartering, loaning, keeping for sale and transporting spirituous liquors. There was no demurrer to the indictment on account of it charging improperly the commission of more than one offense, nor was there any motion made to require the attorney for the Commonwealth to elect, for which, of the offenses charged in the indictment, he would prosecute the appellant under the…