Legal Opinion

Cornett v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 13, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Perry, Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Miller

Affirming.

The appellant, Lucian Cornett, was indicted in the Perry circuit court for having intoxicating liquor in his possession on March 5th, 1916, for the purpose of selling it in local option territory. Upon his trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty, and fixed his punishment at a fine of $100.00 and confinement in the county jail for forty days, and applied the working statute to the verdict.. Cornett appeals, insisting that the verdict was rendered through passion or prejudice of the jury, and is not supported by the evidence.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Peters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Combs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. M. V. Monarch Co. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  5. Salings v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Polley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Combs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Fugate v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
  5. Combs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API