Sizemore v. Commonwealth

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

Judgments were rendered against the appellant Size-more in four prosecutions by indictment instituted against him for selling spirituous, vinous, malt and intoxicating liquors, and mixtures thereof, in local option *339territory. He asks a reversal of each of the judgments, because the court erred in admitting incompetent evidence, and in misinstructing the jury. The facts in each case are substantially alike, and the same instructions were given in each. We will, therefore, dispose of them together..

The prosecuting witness in each case testified that…