Legal Opinion

Carr v. Diamond

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1964No. 43,353PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

This is a continuation of the controversy involved in Carr v. Diamond, 192 Kan. 336, 388 P. 2d 589. Defendant, R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., “Innes,” appeals from a judgment dismissing the action with prejudice while its appeal from a judgment overruling its demurrer to the petition and other procedural matters were pending.

The plaintiff appealed to the district court from a judgment of the court of common pleas of Sedgwick County, Kansas. After perfecting his appeal, plaintiff filed a motion to have R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., “Innes” made an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Pugsley v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Heizer v. PawseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Barstow v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Owen v. StarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harsch v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Guerrero v. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Taber v. TaberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. In Re BrowningCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  5. In Re Estate of RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API