Heizer v. Pawsey
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Barton District Court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the nature-of the action, and the material facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Green, C.:
This was an action upon a bond executed by the plaintiff in error, in an action commenced by the defendant in error against H. M. Fordham, in which an order of arrest had been procured. The bond sued on .had been given in the ■ district court of Barton county, to obtain the discharge of Fordham from arrest. The original suit of Elizabeth Pawsey against H. M. Fordham was prosecuted to judgment October 15, 1886, and the order of arrest was sustained by the district court. On the 24th day of January, 1887, H. M. Fordham filed in this court a petition in error and case-made,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Goetz v. GoetzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Armstrong v. MayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Carr v. DiamondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Delay v. YostSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.