Bundy v. McClarnon
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Suit by Bundy against McClarnon for partition of real estate of which the former alleged he was ■owner as tenant in common with the latter.
McClarnon set up by way of cross-complaint, among other things, that he was the owner in fee simple and in possession ■of the entire tract of land described in the complaint, and that the assertion by Bundy of title to any part thereof was ■wrongful and a cloud upon the cross-complainant’s title,which ‘he prayed might be quieted.
Upon what purports to be a special finding of facts by the ■court there were conclusions of law stated, followed by a judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mattox v. HightshueIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Wright v. KleylaIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cook v. WallingIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Kinnaman v. PyleIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wolverton v. WolvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Weaver v. AppleIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- De Vitt v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lyon v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Mullahy v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.