Legal Opinion

Kinnaman v. Pyle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The object of this action was to obtain partition of a forty-acre tract of land which was properly described in the complaint. The action was brought by Elizabeth Pyle, John Pyle, her husband, and Daniel Ralph, against Harriet Mickals, Henry Mickals, her. husband, and Zachariah Kinnaman, Senior.

It was alleged in the complaint that Celany Kinnaman, who was the wife of Zachariah Kinnaman, Senior, died seized of the land described in the complaint; that Elizabeth Pyle, Harriet Mickals, and Daniel Ralph were the children of the said Celany by a former marriage, and that each of them was the owner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. . WagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Sims v. RicketsIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Mattox v. HightshueIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Winans v. . PeeblesNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Thompson v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scranton v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. O'Harra v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Heal v. Niagara Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Harden v. Darwin & PulleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Watson Coal & Mining Co. v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API