Legal Opinion

P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC v. Cendant Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 7, 2001No. CIV. 98-4734(WHW), CIV. 98-5384(WHW)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLS, District Judge.

Defendants Cendant Corporation, Inc. (“Cendant”), Ernst & Young, LLP (“E & Y”), E. Kirk Shelton (“Shelton”), and Christopher K. McLeod (“McLeod”) have renewed their motions to dismiss the Amended Complaints in the above actions. 1 The Third Circuit’s August 10, 2000 Opinion (the “August 10 Opinion”) reversed and remanded this court’s earlier determination to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b) for failure to state a claim under Section 10(b) and Ruie 10b 5, and claims against individual defendants for control person liability under Section 20(a). See Semerenko…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Winer Family Trust v. QueenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC v. Cendant Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  3. In Re Intelligroup Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
  4. Del Sontro v. Cendant Corp., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  5. In Re Raytheon Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API