Legal Opinion

Palmer v. O'Hara

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1947No. Appeal, 7PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The broad question on this appeal is whether the issuance by a licensed osteopath or osteopathic physician of a certificate committing a mentally ill person to a hospital for mental diseases for care and treatment constitutes an unauthorized practice of medicine. More specifically, is a duly licensed osteopath a “qualified physician” within the definition of Sec. 103 of the Mental Health Act of 1923 so as to be entitled (under Sec. 302 of the same Act) to certify persons for commitment as mentally ill and in need of treatment and care in a hospital for mental…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Childs v. SmeltzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Harris v. State Board of Optometrical ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Neill v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Martin v. BaldySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Long v. Metzger, S. B. M. E., Etc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Everett v. HarronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Bravo Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API