Legal Opinion
Hill v. Hoover Co.
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided October 1, 2012No. Case No. 1:06-CV-00096-SPMPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
STEPHAN P. MICKLE, Senior District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Class Action Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum in Support (doc. 86) (“Motion to Dismiss”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The plaintiff filed Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (doc. 91). For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- American Dental Assoc. v. Cigna Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Schechner v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- In re Horizon Organic Milk Plus Dha Omega-3 Marketing & Sales Practice LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Air Capital Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- SIG, Inc. v. AT & T Digital Life, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.