Legal Opinion
Hale v. Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1993No. Nos. 88-15785, 89-15162PublishedCited by 203 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Felton Hale, John Leroy Fuller and other inmates in Arizona correctional facilities who have worked for state prison industries programs seek to be paid the federal minimum wage on the ground that they are “employees” of the prison under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. They filed complaints against the State of Arizona, ARCOR Enterprises (ARCOR) and its successor Arizona Correctional Industries (ACI), and officials of the Arizona Department of Corrections (DOC), ARCOR, and ACI for damages and injunctive relief under the FLSA, 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by203 opinions
- Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Ronald G. Bryant v. David Madigan, Nancy Griffin, and Dorothy MulcaheyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Donald Gene Henthorn v. Department of NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Mills v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Carol A. Timmer v. Michigan Department of Commerce and Michigan Department of Civil Service, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.