Legal Opinion
Carol A. Timmer v. Michigan Department of Commerce and Michigan Department of Civil Service, United States of America, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 15, 1997No. 95-1706PublishedCited by 159 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J., joined by Siler, J.,
BOGGS, J. (pp. 846-847), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Carol A. Timmer appeals an order granting summary judgment to defendants1 in this action under the Equal Pay Act (Act), 29 U.S.C. § 206(d). After finding that plaintiff had established a prima facie ease of wage discrimination, the District Court concluded that defendant was entitled to summary judgment on its affirmative defense of a differential based on a factor other than sex, here a mistake as to the male co-worker’s proper classification. We first conclude…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- United States v. Wendell LayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Nathaniel Brent v. Wayne Cty. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Trevor Carten v. Kent State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Dorothy Kovacevich v. Kent State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.