Legal Opinion

Moss v. Moss

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1931No. 23207. Department TwoPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This is an action for contribution from a divorced husband for expenditures made by tbe wife in caring for tbe disabled son of tbe parties, and to require the father to make future monthly payments for the maintenance of the invalid son. The trial of the cause to the court resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, as contribution from the defendant for the support of the son, fifteen dollars monthly for three years immediately preceding the commencement of the action, and twenty dollars monthly thereafter until the further order of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gould v. AustinWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Harbican v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Clambey v. CoplandWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Magee v. RisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Rea v. EslickWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Occidental Life Insurance v. PowersWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Arche v. United StatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. Nelson v. NelsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Kramer v. CarrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Tremblay v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API