Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Weston

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 2000No. 41 E.D. Appeal Docket 1999PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

The sole issue presented is whether a conviction of voluntary manslaughter abrogates the requisite intent for convictions for possessing an instrument of crime and criminal conspiracy. For the reasons stated herein, we hold that a conviction for voluntary manslaughter does not negate the requisite intent for convictions of possessing an instrument of crime and criminal conspiracy and thus, reverse the Superior Court.

The facts, at trial, established the following. Tyrone Weston’s co-conspirator, Le-Le, was involved in an argument with Derwin Fowler, the decedent, about…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. NesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. KarkariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RiveraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth, Aplt v. DescaresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. MatthewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. KimbroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API