Legal Opinion

Sheedy v. Stall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1970PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The issue is whether evidence was properly excluded because it was hearsay.

Plaintiff is a real estate broker and this action is to recover a commission. Pursuant to an oral agreement with the defendants he offered defendants’ ranch for sale. ① Plaintiff secured the signatures of Mr. Ma-tuna, as purchaser, and the defendants, as sellers, to an earnest money agreement dated and executed December 21,1966. The agreement provided: “This earnest money receipt is subject to the buyer’s approval of the new road alignment through See. 7, and to the buyer’s attorney approving this earnest money receipt…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Marr v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Anderson v. Wallowa National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hutchison v. SEMLEROregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Koepke Sayles & Co. v. LustigWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Frink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Manahan v. Daily News-TribuneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. State v. MendezOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ken Hood Construction Co. v. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Nationwide Resources Corp. v. MassabniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API