Legal Opinion

Bloech v. Hyland Homes Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

Ths is a suit to enforce an alleged trust growing out of a written contract for the sale of Lot 8, Bloch 41, Taylor’s Addition to the City of Astoria. The written contract was entered into by defendant, Hyland Homes Company, a corporation, and plaintiff on January 11, 1917. Subsequently, and on March 3, 1920, said defendant conveyed said lot to the defendants, Edward E. Gray and Edna Ida Gray, husband and wife, and the deed was placed of record on March 16, 1920, by said grantees, who now hold the legal title thereto.

This is the second time this case has been appealed to this court. The first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armsby v. Grays Harbor Commercial Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bloech v. Hyland Homes Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Smith v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Bush v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stockmen's Supply Co. v. JenneIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Adskim v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Vandeventer v. Dale Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Whitehead v. FoxhillDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
  5. Whitehead v. FoxhillDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API