Armsby v. Grays Harbor Commercial Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: . Robert G. Morrow, Judge. Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Eakin. This is an action by The J. K. Armsby Company, a corporation, plaintiff and appellant, against Grays Harbor Commercial Company, a corporation; Northwestern Lumber Company, a corporation; Standard Box & Lumber Company, a corporation; Star Box Company, a corporation ; Multnomah Lumber & Box Company, a corporation; Multnomah Trunk Company, a corporation; Astoria Box Company, a corporation; Clatsop…
Read the full summary
From Multnomah: . Robert G. Morrow, Judge. Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Eakin. This is an action by The J. K. Armsby Company, a corporation, plaintiff and appellant, against Grays Harbor Commercial Company, a corporation; Northwestern Lumber Company, a corporation; Standard Box & Lumber Company, a corporation; Star Box Company, a corporation ; Multnomah Lumber & Box Company, a corporation; Multnomah Trunk Company, a corporation; Astoria Box Company, a corporation; Clatsop Mill Company, a corporation; Necanicum Spruce Lumber Company, a corporation; Davidson Fruit Company, a corporation; F.…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Eakin.
The motion for judgment of nonsuit, filed by Courteney, specifies six grounds therefor; the third being that “plaintiff’s evidence shows that on October 12, 1906, plaintiff was in default for nonpayment of the moneys due for shooks purchased and delivered under said contract, and that while in default plaintiff canceled and rescinded the contract and refused to be further bound by it, and refused to make payment of the sums then due thereunder, to wit, the sum of $8,900.” Others of the motions followed the language of the statute in assigning the grounds of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Graves v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Wooten v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sagamore Corporation v. WillcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Mohr v. LearOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Title & Trust Co. v. Durkheimer Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Daniels v. Foster & KleiserOregon Supreme Court · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.