Legal Opinion

Dixon v. National American Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 1, 1987No. C6-87-804PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.

Appellants appeal from a summary judgment declaring that respondent has no duty to defend or indemnify appellants in a lawsuit brought against them by the purchasers of their house.

FACTS

In October, 1983, Stephen Dixon and his former wife (not a party) sold their home to George and Darlene Miller. When Dixon and his former wife owned the house and until the sale closed, the house was insured under a homeowner’s policy issued by National American Insurance Company (“National”).

In October 1984, the Millers commenced an action against Dixon and his current wife,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. KatzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Aluise v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Continental Insurance Co. v. BonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Mutlu v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. BrewerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API