Dixon v. National American Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.
Appellants appeal from a summary judgment declaring that respondent has no duty to defend or indemnify appellants in a lawsuit brought against them by the purchasers of their house.
FACTS
In October, 1983, Stephen Dixon and his former wife (not a party) sold their home to George and Darlene Miller. When Dixon and his former wife owned the house and until the sale closed, the house was insured under a homeowner’s policy issued by National American Insurance Company (“National”).
In October 1984, the Millers commenced an action against Dixon and his current wife,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Lanoue v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. KatzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Aluise v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- Continental Insurance Co. v. BonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Mutlu v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. BrewerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.