Legal Opinion

Mc Dermott v. Mc Dermott

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 30, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hartman, J. C. C.

(temporarily assigned). A motion to enforce litigant’s rights—in substance, a motion for contempt—raises a question whether the award of alimony, in view of the conduct of the parties thereafter, still has continuing effect.

Plaintiff is the former wife of the defendant. She was granted an absolute divorce by judgment entered in this court July 25, 1969, which judgment included a provision for periodic alimony at $15 a week, payable through the probation office.

Defendant made his payments regularly until sometime in August 1971, when he and plaintiff resumed living together,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamby v. PyeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Paille v. PailleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
  3. Honigsbaum v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McDermott v. McDermottNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API