Legal Opinion
McDermott v. McDermott
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 30, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
120 N.J. Super. 42 (1972)
293 A.2d 232
GENEVIEVE McDERMOTT, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WILLIAM McDERMOTT, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided June 30, 1972.
Mr. Salvatore Muscato, attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Edmund J. Tucker, attorney for defendant.
HARTMAN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
A motion to enforce litigant's rights in substance, a motion for contempt raises a question whether the award of alimony, in view of the conduct of the parties thereafter, still has continuing effect.
Plaintiff is the former wife of the defendant. She was granted an absolute divorce by judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martindell v. MartindellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Wedinger v. GoldbergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Parmly v. ParmlySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Hamby v. PyeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Paille v. PailleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tash v. TashNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002